Second amended development agreement

What the record says#

• The agreement describes four development phases and a maximum of 1,300 dwellings: 840 single-family and 460 multifamily or single-family attached homes.

  PDF page 3

• It lists 254,000 square feet of commercial retail, 80,000 square feet of commercial office, 31,000 square feet of synagogues or shuls, and two private schools totaling 1,200 students.

  PDF page 3

• The stated maximum gross density is 2.48 dwellings per acre. Height limits are 35 feet for residential buildings and public-service or house-of-worship uses, and 45 feet for commercial buildings.

  PDF page 3

• The amended sewer provisions require wastewater collection and treatment capacity for each phase before a certificate of occupancy for a structure in that phase; connection to public wastewater service is contemplated when available.

  PDF pages 3, 4

• The agreement provides for county review of site plans, traffic, landscaping, surveys and permits, with independent professional review at the developer's expense.

  PDF pages 5, 6, 7

• Development-order approval does not itself waive infrastructure completion requirements. The stated overall development-order term is six years, with up to three approved one-year extensions.

  PDF page 7

• The agreement assigns the cost of SR 78 access improvements to the developer. Access Point 1 improvements precede Phase 1 development-order approval; Access Point 2 improvements precede the first certificate of occupancy.

  PDF pages 9, 10

• Internal roads are to be owned and maintained by the CDD or association, rather than conveyed to the county. The agreement also assigns wastewater and common-element maintenance and requires property-owner participation in the association.

  PDF pages 13, 14

• The development agreement has a 30-year term, with additional five-year terms if the developer obligations remain incomplete, and provides for annual county review. This differs from the six-year development-order validity period.

  PDF page 15

How to read this record#

These are permitted uses and contractual requirements, not a count of built or occupied structures. The May 2026 concurrency agreement adds a narrower capacity-based limitation.

The recorded agreement includes redlined prior language. The summary follows the readable amended provisions rather than adding deleted and replacement text together.

County index description#

SECOND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LAKEFRONT ESTATES PD PROJECT

The supplied name searches matched the To field in the county index. The source context below preserves the matched names and search scope. Index labels do not substitute for the parties’ roles stated in the document.

Related recorded instruments#

• 202322001970 · July 2023 development agreement
• 202522003097 · Developer improvement construction and assurance agreement
• 202522003098 · Ordinance 2024-07: planned-development amendments
• 202622001519 · Phase 1 wastewater concurrency limitations agreement

In the project timeline#

• November 4, 2025 · Recorded: Second amended development agreement

Reporting using this record#

• Lakefront’s 33 Street Names: Phase 1 and the Wine Connection

Retrieve the original#

Search the Glades County official-records portal using instrument 202522003099, or book 420, page 303. County image-session links can expire.

Summaries identify the source pages. The original PDF controls if a transcription differs. Glades County records have been checked through Oct 28, 2026; see the collection scope. Acquisition dates and the limits of earlier collection batches remain in the source entries.